Securing Romania’s Energy and Climate Future: Policy Choices, and Public Support
Romania’s updated NECP represents an improvement in coherence and ambition, but its effectiveness is constrained by delayed formal adoption and persistent delivery and governance risks. Methodological robustness and transparency remain uneven, raising potential credibility and implementation concerns particularly in the LULUCF sector. Romania’s transition strategy remains strongly anchored in its traditional energy security strengths, yet relies heavily on a limited number of large-scale projects, increasing exposure to execution, financing, and political continuity risks. Emerging transition-era vulnerabilities, such as supply chain dependencies, critical raw materials, circularity, and climate resilience are insufficiently integrated into the NECP’s risk framework. Household affordability constitutes a...
